Happy Sunday Reader:
It's been a few months since you've heard from me, and I owe you an explanation.
Since September, I've been completely immersed in a commercial arbitration that pulled me away from everything else - including this newsletter.
The case concluded two weeks ago, and what I learned changes everything I thought I knew about practicing law in 2025.
In this newsletter I want to share how what I learned previews the battles every business and legal practice will face over the next few years.
The Case - and the Irony
I represented a minority shareholder founder whose co-founders wanted her out - while wanting to keep using the intellectual property she'd disclosed to the company without compensating her.
IP she'd developed over decades.
While the founder never assigned her IP to the company, her co-founders believed that AI changed everything; that once information exists "out there," artificial intelligence makes it non-confidential.
Their logic?
If AI can eventually figure it out, it's not a secret worth protecting.
As a result, they were already feeding her frameworks, methodologies, and specialized knowledge into AI systems to scale and commercialize her expertise.
Without her permission.
Without compensation.
The irony here is that while I was fighting for my client's right to control how AI uses her intellectual property, I was simultaneously using AI to practice better law than I've ever practiced before.